Friday, August 22, 2014
OPENINGS IN OUR NEXT ONLINE CLASS
Hi
folks,
As
most of you know, I run an online novel writing class that runs for ten weeks
at a time and is in operation year-round. We’re coming up to the end of the
current session in a couple of weeks, and then will take a couple of weeks off
and then begin the next session. Usually, we don’t have openings for new class
members, but it looks as if we’re going to have a couple of openings this time,
so I just want to let folks know in case anyone’s interested. If you are,
please send me an email at butchedgerton@comcast.net
and let me know. Below, I’ll give an outline of how it works. When new openings
occur, first chance to join is given to the auditors and after that it’s a
first-come, first-served basis. To be able to devote the proper time to each
student, the class will be limited to ten people. An unlimited number of
auditors are taken.
Auditors
Those
interested in auditing the class—which would allow the auditing person to
receive and view everything the rest of the class does, but not be able to
participate actively, solely as an observer. The fee is substantially less for
auditors than participating students. Basically, auditors will sit in on the
class as an observer. There can be an unlimited number of auditors. Some writers are uncomfortable with very many observing their work and our exchanges
as, to be honest, many of our comments are brutally frank. Students know and
welcome this, but to someone not directly participating can see it another way.
There won’t be any interaction at all with auditors—they’ll be there simply to
use the knowledge they might pick up for their own writing or even their own
teaching.
Pertinent info
for active class members:
This
class will be conducted in a workshop format. What that means is each week
participants will send a designated number of pages to both me and the other
members of the class. When I receive each person’s work, I’ll provide
comments/criticism/suggestions to improve for each student on their work and
then send it back to them and the others in class. Each person in class does
the same for each other—reading and providing comments on each other’s work and
sending that back to the class and me. It’s exactly like being in an
“on-ground” workshop. I’ve found over a lifetime of teaching classes—beginning
with the UCLA Writer’s Program—that this is the single best method of learning.
There is a synergy at work with this model. Many writing classes consist of the
student sending work in and the instructor commenting. That’s okay, in a
limited way, but when you have ten others plus the instructor or workshop
leader commenting, the value of the class increases almost exponentially.
I
believe in road maps when embarking on the lengthy journey a novel entails;
therefore, I ask each student to submit a 15-20 word outline of their proposed novel. I don’t have the space here
to explain how that works, but I send a handout on how to create such an
outline before the class begins, and it serves to keep the writer focused on
their novel throughout its creation and also helps the workshop leader and his
classmates see instantly if the writer is focused or meandering. I’m a firm
believer in beginning a novel in the proper place and once that is achieved,
the remainder of the novel becomes infinitely easier to create. We’ll spend the
most time on a writer’s novel beginning than any other part of their novel.
This
class will be composed of students who’ve previously taken classes with me
along with newcomers. To be able to serve each level of student fairly,
students who are well along into their novel and have taken previous classes,
will be able to submit up to eight pages per week. New students who haven’t
taken my class, will be allowed to submit up to five pages per week until they’ve
achieved a publishable opening, and, once they’ve achieved a proper beginning,
will then be able to send eight pages each week thereafter. Please know that
this may sound like favoritism, but it’s not at all. The beginning of a novel
is the single most crucial part of writing a novel, imo, and I spend more time
on that than anything else. I’ve learned over many years, that a great many
writers have a poor understanding of a novel’s structure and it’s crucial that
a sound knowledge of novel structure (particularly beginnings) be achieved
before devoting much time to the rest of the novel. I’ll spend much more time on
the newer student’s five pages than I will on the more experienced writer’s.
Please feel free to query those in class who’ve been with me before as to their
opinion and I feel certain they’ll agree with me. I’ll be happy to furnish
names and email addresses for those writers should you wish to ask their
opinion.
Periodically,
I also send handouts to the class on some element of writing, as well as other
pertinent info that’s useful.
Be
forewarned that this workshop isn’t for the faint of heart! Some have termed it
“Les Edgerton’s Bootcamp for Writers.” In “real life” I’m not a mean person, but
with writing I’m not going to hold hands nor hand out false praise. That’s what most local
writing groups are for and they do it well. I expect each person to participate
fully and comment on each other’s work just as they would want others to do the
same for theirs. I don’t tolerate very well, those who keep making the same
mistakes week after week. For example, the proper and professional format is
explained at the beginning and each class there are always one or two newcomers
who keep making the same, easily-fixed mistake. Here’s a common example: One of
the format rules is that there is only one space between sentences in
computer-generated material. Many older writers, in the typewriter days of
yore, were taught to use two spaces. The kernaling in computers is different than
typewriters and using two spaces is a sure sign of an amateur who hasn’t kept
up with current usages and just another red flag a writer ought to avoid. I
understand it’s a hard habit to overcome—I had to do the same myself—but there
is an easy way to relearn this which we give, and even if it takes awhile to
relearn this, a writer can at least do a final edit before sending work in and
correct this. To not do so, indicates to me a writer who doesn’t respect either
themselves or their fellow writers or the teacher. Frankly, I don’t want to
waste time with this type of writer. I’m not speaking of the writer who makes
occasional mistakes, but of the one who continually keeps making the same
mistake after it’s been pointed out.
Writing
well isn’t easy. It’s hard. If someone has told you that writing is easy,
they’ve lied to you. Typing is easy; writing is hard. Our aim in our class is
to help writers create publishable work. By reputable publishers, not vanity
presses.
If
I haven’t scared you off, here are the particulars:
1.
Fee is $400, payable in advance and nonrefundable. Auditor’s fee is $50 and is
also nonrefundable.
2.
Each week, you’ll send to the entire group and me, your pages. You’ll also
receive work from your classmates to read and provide comments on. The comments
aren’t intended to be scholarly or exhibit some high degree of technical
knowledge. We just want to know what worked for you in the person's writing and what
didn’t and why.
3.
To help make the class run smoothly, there will be deadlines each week. For
instance, if the class begins on a Monday each week, you’ll send in your work
by the following Wednesday. Then, starting on Thursday, you’ll send in your
comments on each other’s work. I’ll send my comments to each of you by Saturday
night. Then, the next week begins on the following Monday.
4.
Often, the class and I kind of hit a wall. It’s pretty intense. To account for
that event, we may take a week hiatus and return the following week. In fact,
you can pretty well count on that.
5.
We don’t expect a student to be a professional writer at all. It’s a class, not
an advanced degree program. Our aim is to help each writer become better at
their craft as a result of the class, and to learn how to professionally submit
material, and to hopefully end up creating work that is publishable legitimately.
6.
While I would never say I would recommend students to agents or publishers,
very often I do. The people who finish the class almost always have progressed
to the point where their work is, indeed, publishable, and when that happens
I’m eager to introduce them and recommend their work to gatekeepers.
7.
Required reading will be my book, HOOKED, and Jack Bickham’s book, SCENES &
STRUCTURE. Recommended reading will be Janet Burroway’s WRITING FICTION.
If
anyone is interested and has more questions, please feel free to email me at butchedgerton@comcast.net.
Thank
you,
Les
P.S.
Some additional info…
We’ll have a couple of new students
this time—most writers keep re-upping each time but occasionally one or two
will drop out for various reasons: demands of a new job not allowing them to
commit the considerable time that is required to participate, needing time off
to address the notes their new agent just gave them for the novel he signed,
and so on. Most just keep on, even after they’ve gotten an agent and/or sold their
novel, and begin writing a new one. Almost all who stick out the entire session
come back. The ones who quit usually quit fairly soon into the class. It’s not
for everyone. Nobody holds anybody’s hand and every single one of us is focused
on but one thing—helping each other write a novel that’s publishable. It’s a
tough game and not for everyone.
I try to warn people who are
thinking of joining us, how tough the class is, but I know from past experience
that even so forewarned, at least some are going to be in for a shock when they
see that we really don’t hold hands, pat people on the back for minimum
efforts, or overlook writing that doesn’t work. I’m not cruel (at least I don’t
think so) nor are any of the oldtimers in class, but most new folks haven’t
been exposed to a class like ours. The truth is, most writers who haven’t had a
class like ours has been praised in other classes or most likely, has been in
classes that use the “sandwich” method of teaching. You know—that deal where
the teach applies a bit of praise, then a bit of criticism, and then a bit of
praise. Well, that ain’t our shtick. Not even close. The comments we all
provide on everyone’s work fit one definition only. They’re honest.
This isn’t to be mean or to act like
we’re the only folks around who know what good writing is. Except… we do. I’m
not aware of any other class out there with the kind of track record ours
enjoys. Virtually every writer who stays the course with us ends up with a top
agent and/or a book deal. That doesn’t happen in a single ten-week session.
About the earliest anyone has earned an agent or book deal in our class has
been about a year. And, that’s reasonable.
The thing is, our writers don’t
expect things to be easy.
Here are a few comments by students:
Hi ________. Since Les opened the
floor for comments from the "class veterans" I'm chipping in with my
two cents. I have a file cabinet filled with stuff I sent Les and then needed
asbestos gloves to take the paper off the printer. When I started this journey,
I'd never taken an English class past high school. (I was pre-med in college) I
figured I love to read, so how hard can it be? Okay, quit laughing at me.
Clearly, when I wrote my first version of my first novel, I had no idea about
story structure, POV, any of that. I figured I'm pretty articulate and
therefore I can write?
Les quickly set me straight. All of
this is to point out that we've all been on the receiving end of Les' brutal
honesty. I will find some of the comments he made on my work and post them but
phrases like "throwing up in my mouth now" and "bury this so
deep in the yard no one ever finds it" are seared into my brain and I
don't have to look to find those!!! The point is, I took other classes before I
met Les and the teachers were kind and gentle and never told me I sucked. If it
weren't for Les, I'd still be churning out awful drivel that makes people want
to throw up instead of trying not to throw up while I wait to see if my agent
is able to sell my book. I would never have gotten an agent without Les. So
hang in there. Listen to everything he says and if it doesn't make sense, ask
away.
...and...
The novel that I am currently trying
to sell has been a work in progress since 2009. The first time Les saw it he
sent it back and told me to re-write the WHOLE thing!!! My character was a wimp.
She sat back and let things happen to her. I argued a little, rewrote a little
and then moved on to another book. After a year, I went back and reread it and
saw the truth. It was awful. So I took a deep breath and started over. Page
one. First sentence. Re-wrote the entire thing. It took a full year and then I
revised it again. It's definitely a process. But once you get the Inciting
incident and the outline steps down pat, it's a whole lot easier. Trust me!!!
And you'll never graduate completely. A few months ago, Les and I went
head-to-head on one single passage. I was trying to be lazy and take the easy
way out. He called me on it and I resubmitted three or four weeks in a row,
revisions on the same passage. I was sure my classmates were so sick of it they
were going to stick needles in their eyes rather than read it again! But in the
end, the passage rocked!! So hang in there!!!! It'll get better.
That’s all, folks…
Two of Maegan Beaumont's novels written in class. Maegan is now our administrator for the class.
Tuesday, August 12, 2014
A truly great man has passed...
Hi folks,
The world has lost a great entertainer
and a wholly original genius. Robin Williams was without peer.
I never had the good fortune to meet him
personally, but I felt I almost knew him because of the dozens of stories my
friend Lisa Lieberman Doctor told me about him. Lisa was the person he chose to
head up his production company, Blue Wolf Productions, and she acquired dozens of
scripts for him, including MRS. DOUBTFIRE. In fact, one of the first stories
she told me about him was how they acquired that product.
Lisa said that she turned down the
script. It just wasn’t that well-written, in her opinion. However, Robin chose
to override her rejection of it—which he could because he was… well, the boss…
It wasn’t the script he liked, Lisa said, but the concept. She told me that
scarcely any of the original script made it to the screen. She said Robin
improvised virtually all of it.
She told me a funny story that happened
on the first day of principle photography on the set of MRS. DOUBTFIRE. When
the cameras begin rolling, large sums of money are being expended, and it’s
extremely important nothing slow up the shooting.
Well, Lisa said, everyone on the set was
worried when Robin didn’t appear immediately. True, it took several hours to
get him into costume and one of the main problems was that Robin was an
extremely hirsute man. She said he had hair everywhere and for the scenes he
appeared as Mrs. Doubtfire, it took several hours to remove the hair from his
shoulders, back, arms, legs… everywhere. His beard was particularly tough and extremely
difficult to render smooth.
Anyway, the tension was rising as he
failed to appear on the set, everyone getting more and more nervous, and then,
all of a sudden, he was in Lisa’s office, in full costume, and with a stricken
look on his face. “Lisa,” he said, “I’m supposed to go on camera right now but
I’ve got a big problem.” “What?” she said, imagining all kinds of horrible
scenarios. “Well,” Robin said. “I don’t know what to do. I’ve got to go on… and
I’ve got a woody.”
Now, Lisa is a tiny Jewish woman and I
could just imagine her looking up at this large man, dressed in a dress, and
lifting her hands helplessly, and saying, “Uh…what exactly do you want me to
do, Robin?” And then he laughed and all the tension went out of the room, and
the first day of principle photography went well.
Over the years of our friendship, Lisa
has told me literally dozens and dozens of stories about Robin. Nearly every
one of them made me laugh. Some made me sad. All were stories that couldn’t be
told about any other person. Robin Williams was truly a genius, truly a Renaissance
man. A true original and a national treasure.
He’ll be sorely missed.
Blue skies,
Les
Thursday, August 7, 2014
COVER REVEAL AND ON OUTLINING
Late update: I just received an email from Joseph D'Agnese where he said:
Mr Edgerton:
I tried to leave a comment on your recent post on outlining but the system devoured it whole.
The outlining method you describe was first described by journalist Jon Franklin in his book Writing for Story. Great book, but it is mostly focused on writing in-depth journalism pieces. My wife and I love that book and refer to it often. But I have always struggled with how to apply his method to longer works of fiction. I think my hangup has always been about to describe an entire book in only five sentences. But I think you have nailed it. Thank you!
Joe
I thanked him for not only letting me know who to give credit for the outlining method, but for going the extra mile in reaching me--much appreciated! So now you know where I got it--from the legendary Jon Franklin!
Also, Joe isn't the first person who's contacted me and told me he couldn't post a comment here. I don't know what to do about that--does anyone have any solutions or suggestions? Keep in mind I barely know what a keyboard is and very little about how the Intergnat works--especially blogs! I hate it that people try to comment and are unable to--my apologies!
Mr Edgerton:
I tried to leave a comment on your recent post on outlining but the system devoured it whole.
The outlining method you describe was first described by journalist Jon Franklin in his book Writing for Story. Great book, but it is mostly focused on writing in-depth journalism pieces. My wife and I love that book and refer to it often. But I have always struggled with how to apply his method to longer works of fiction. I think my hangup has always been about to describe an entire book in only five sentences. But I think you have nailed it. Thank you!
Joe
I thanked him for not only letting me know who to give credit for the outlining method, but for going the extra mile in reaching me--much appreciated! So now you know where I got it--from the legendary Jon Franklin!
Also, Joe isn't the first person who's contacted me and told me he couldn't post a comment here. I don't know what to do about that--does anyone have any solutions or suggestions? Keep in mind I barely know what a keyboard is and very little about how the Intergnat works--especially blogs! I hate it that people try to comment and are unable to--my apologies!
Hi folks,
Today, fellow writer Ransom Noble posted an article on outlining in her blog and she graciously mentioned my method. Since I last posted it in 2010, I thought perhaps it might be time for a rerun. Also, I have some exciting news--I have a cover for my newest novel, THE GENUINE, IMITATION, PLASTIC KIDNAPPING coming out in October from Down&Out Books. You'll see it at the end of this article. Hope you like it and hope you'll buy the book when it comes out!
OUTLINING
A STORY
Anyone
on this blog whom I’ve taught will recognize the following. It’s always the
first lesson I give in both online and “on-ground” creative writing classes. I
decided to post this because recently, on another forum, I’ve been seeing a lot
of conversations based on outlining. What I’ve observed from their remarks is
that the great majority have only experienced one kind of outline—that old
composition thing with the Roman numerals that go on for pages… What I’m going
to show here is a very different kind of outline. One that makes sense. Is
infinitely simpler and actually works.
Let’s
cover some history first…
Like a lot of writers, I wasted a
lot of time in my writing career simply because I ignored what is probably the
biggest "secret" in creating short stories and novels. I didn't
outline.
Outlines were a particular type
of hell English teachers visited upon you - those horrid things with Roman
numerals and topics and subtopics and all that junk. Yuch! Outlining took all
the fun out of reading a book.
I also read interviews with
writers who said they never outlined. It would destroy their
"creativity" many claimed. The way to write a story was to create a
character, start them out in trouble and kind of follow them around as they had
neat adventures. What it took years to realize was that my characters had great
adventures and it was kind of fun following them around...until somewhere
between pages eight and twenty when they would peter out. I had a drawerful of
some of the best starts of stories you ever saw. Problem was, they never went
anywhere. And most of them never came close to an ending. Oh, a few did, the
really short ones. There were even one or two that came to a respectable
length...after rewriting them twenty times.
What I didn't realize for the
longest time was that writing involves the processing and integration of large
blocks of trivial bits of information. As the length of my stories grew, so did
the complexity. All of a sudden, I was on page thirteen and I suddenly
remembered I couldn't have my character chase the bad guy...because on page two
I'd given him bronchial asthma. I had to go back and "cure" him. What
I didn't realize was something pretty obvious. A story, like the life it
represents, is basically complex. Stories aren't built like a line of dominoes,
it more resembles a web, and when you tug a bit harder on one of its many
strands, the whole business vibrates. And changes shape. Not only did I have to
remember the many details and their connections, I had to keep them in a
logical order. Virtually impossible.
I even managed to write several
books in this manner. Looking back on those days I cringe. What an awful lot of
energy I needlessly wasted!
Here was my typical process. I
bet at least some of you have gone through the same procedure. I'd get a great
idea, so great that I'd have to drop the baby if I was holding him, and fly to
my typewriter. (Remember - this was in the days of yore when they had those
ancient artifacts...) As fast as my fingers could fly, I'd write. A hundred
words would accumulate. Then, two hundred. Then...well, then I began to run
into problems.
Something I did in the first
hundred words didn't quite fit with the three hundredth, but I wasn't quite
sure what it was. Something was just "off". It would bother and
confuse me, but I didn't want to deal with it. So, I'd push on, fix it later,
whatever it was. Just get the stuff out, in the white heat of creativity.
That's what rewriting was for, right? To fix stuff that didn't fit.
Only now the writing really
slowed. The next fifty words were the hardest. I was running out of steam. The
idea I'd begun with seemed stale, trite. If I could even remember the original
idea. Crap! I'd say, finally, slamming shut the typewriter case. Maybe tomorrow
the Muse would redescend...
Hardly ever happened. On the
morrow, a new idea would strike, with the same kind of heat as the first one
and I'd be off and running with that one.
With the same results.
In no time at all, I had boxes of
unfinished stories. Sound familiar?
Well, I learned a trick. I won't
go through the whole sorry history of how I wasted time and learned, little by
little, to work smarter. What happened, after many centuries (well, it seems
like that now) was that I began kind of jotting down a half page of notes. I
even began figuring out my endings before I began.
Now I began to finish stories.
Not a lot, but a lot more than I had previously. After a couple of years of
this, I began to expand my notes. Never once did I think of what I was doing as
"outlining." There weren't any Roman numeral. How could that be an
outline?
And then...one day I got one of
those Joycean epiphanies. What I was doing was an outline! But, these weren't
outlines like Missus Grundy had us doing back in P.S. 121. These were just
notes. Notes kind of organized. And I discovered something else. Those old
writers were liars. Hemingway, Steinbeck and Shakespeare - they all claimed
they didn't outline, but they had to. Their stuff all held the kind of integrity
that only comes in thinking through a project first before you pick up the saw.
They just said they didn't outline. All of a sudden, I knew better.
Those guys probably didn't think they outlined either. I doubt if any of them
had Roman numerals on their notes either. I'd bet money they had notes, though,
and copious notes...and copious notes organized into some kind of system.
Before they ever picked up the ol' writing quill and wrote "Chapter
One". Probably what a lot of them did was write a first draft...and then
used that for their "outline". Without calling it that, of course, or
even thinking of it in that way. Hemingway didn’t outline—he had 80,000 word
outlines (also called a “first draft). Same thing, just a bit cumbersome and
time-consuming to create. I bet that's what they did though. They weren't any
different than I was. Or you. If any writer begins their story without knowing
precisely where they're going, any mistakes they make at first, any tiny
omissions, take on added significance as he or she proceeds. As length grows
linearly, complexity expands exponentially. Fact of life. The writing
life anyway.
If one is muleheaded enough, a
story can be bulled through without outlining. Even fairly long stories. It's
kind of a masochistic exercise though. It may take twenty, even thirty rewrites
to get a decent story that way.
Don't ask me how I know this.
I'll begin crying. I'll have to. My wife knows I recall experiences like this
and keeps all the sharp instruments locked up.
Novels are the worst experience
in the world without an outline. After you spend several years learning to
juggle thousands of details in your head - you can get pretty good at it - you
can write longer and longer material. Except, that no matter how good you get
at retaining all this stuff in your head, you'll probably end up stuck on about
page ninety. That seems to be the magic length for novels. Not quite long
enough by about three hundred pages. Short stories seem to peter out around
between pages six to eight.
If you've got an outline you just
don't have these problems. Stuck? Glance up at your outline and instantly
you'll be reminded where you are in the story and your perspective will return.
The dizzy feeling will recede.
Okay. Sales pitch for outlines
over. I learned my technique from taking screenplay writing classes. Those guys
always outline. That's how they can write scripts so quickly. I took a
class in this program with Martin Goldstein and I wrote a 108-page script in
two days. And Mr. Goldstein says it's a great script - has attached himself to
it as the producer and not only that - this "two-day" script was just
named a semifinalist in the Academy Foundation's Nicholl’s Fellowships in
Screenwriting awards. Not bad for two days work! I wrote the first 64 pages in
about eight hours and the remaining 44 pages in about ten hours. Piece of cake.
Of course, I spent about a week and a half on the outline. I do write quickly,
so don't use my times as a model. Without an outline, I'd still be writing...
Let's get to these puppies.
Here's how you create an outline for your story. Ready?
1. You make notes to yourself as
you imagine the story played out.
2. You arrange those notes.
3. As the writing proceeds, you
refer to them.
That's it. Or so I thought at the
time. It was a lot easier than what I used to do, but there was still something
I was to learn.
I got lucky. I happened on a book
that really opened my eyes as far as outlines. I honestly can’t remember the
book—I’ve got thousands and thousands and thousands of books, literally—and I
wish I could so I could give the author his proper credit (I do remember it was
a man), but he gave me the best outlining tool I’ve ever come across. It’s
nothing at all like those ten-pound puppies with the Roman numerals as you’ll
see.
The outline I propose you try
that I took from this guy’s book on writing consists of five simple statements
that describe the major actions through which the story will be told. One
statement for each major focus. And each statement will be short, consisting
only of two to three words. A human noun, a strong, concrete action
verb, and (most of the time) a direct object. (We won't count articles such as
"a", "an", and "the" as words.) The simpler an
outline is the more it focuses on the important relationships in your story.
Words actually count for more in an outline than in the story. An outline like
I'm proposing should have no more than fifteen to twenty words in it. Twenty
words max for a 400-page novel. In a story, the almost-right word can sometimes
suffice, but in an outline, it has to be the perfect word. Another difference
between this version of an outline and the ones Missus Grundy had you do is
that the statements in her outlines represented topic sentences and as such
specify what comes at the beginning of the section they represent.
That's because in logical writing, the writer states her premise first
and then develops it.
In dramatic stories, however, the
dramatic action that makes your point comes at the end of each section -
where climaxes belong. What this means is that your outline statements
represent endings, not beginnings. This is an important point to keep in mind.
This is ultra-important to grasp. I’ll say it again: Your outline statements represent endings,
not beginnings. I think this is why we hate those old Comp I kinds of
outlines. It doesn’t allow any room for creativity at all. This does.
In almost all novels, there are
three major movements involved as the protagonist struggles to resolve his or
her problem. There are dozens—maybe even hundreds—of smaller movements, but by
and large, there are almost always three major movements or crucial points.
That’s what this kind of outline will show. First, the inciting incident that
kicks off the story. Then, the result
of each of the three major movements. Finally, the resolution. Five statements.
That’s it. The whole of your novel is contained therein. With enormous freedom
within it for those who are afraid their creativity will be stifled…
This is so important to grasping
this that I’m going to belabor it a bit. Each statement represents the result of the major action taken to
resolve the problem. Not the beginning and development of the action.
Major difference and for those that don’t get this, it’s always because they
haven’t shifted their thinking and definition of outlines from those old comp
definitions and models. Again, it represents the outcome of the major action. How you as the author get to that
outcome is totally up to you. It gives you complete creative freedom. Look at
it as the same thing as driving from New York to Los Angeles. You know that’s
your goal. Get to L.A. There are a thousand ways to do that. You might drive
down and go through Arizona. You might go north and go through part of Canada.
You might zig-zag northwest and southwest the whole way. You might go directly
west in a straight line. What’s important is that you end up in L.A., right?
That’s what this kind of outline does. It gives you your outcome (arriving in
L.A.), but it allows you complete freedom in how you get there. I know I keep
repeating this, but I also know from experience how ingrained those godawful
comp I outlines are in our brains, that it’s important that you grasp the
difference.
I'm going to use my own story I
Shoulda Seen a Credit Arranger in my collection titled "Monday's
Meal" to illustrate a typical outline. The first statement will be:
Complication
or inciting incident:
Debt endangers Pete (This is the complication that
provides the occasion for the story. Every story must have an inciting incident
to kick-start it. Something must happen that changes the protagonist's world
and by doing so, creates a problem/goal. This is where stories must begin - not
with setting or backstory. Act I, as it were.)
Development: (This is the second part of the
outline. The development steps that lead to the resolution. Act II, as it were,
following Aristotle's Poetics)
1.Tommy cons Pete into a kidnapping
2. Pete and Tommy botch
kidnapping
3. Pete escapes
Resolution: (This is the third and final
step. Act III.)
Pete pays for mistake
Here’s
the outline without the extraneous material:
Debt endangers Pete.
Tommy cons Pete into a kidnapping
Pete and Tommy botch the
kidnapping
Pete pays for mistake.
I used
this for the 18-page short story that
appeared first in The South Carolina
Review and then I wrote a 92,000 word novel… using the same exact outline.
Worked perfectly for both of them. Oh, yeah. I also wrote a screenplay for this
that was a finalist in both the Writer’s Guild and Best of Austin screenplay
competitons… and guess what? You guessed it. I used the same exact outline and
it worked perfectly. There are major differences in all three versions, but the
central story remained the same and was a practical instrument in all three forms.
It works!
This came to seventeen words, two
over the optimim. If you're under twenty, you're fine. Once I have this
outline, the rest is just filling in the blanks. But, everything in the story
must contribute to the outline. I can't, for instance, start talking about
Pete's childhood in New Orleans, for example. Not unless it contributes to the
situation he's in.
Now. Look at the elements.
There's each of the three things I said should be in the outline. A human noun,
a strong, concrete action verb, and a direct object. I didn't, for instance,
say "Pete is in debt" for my complication. Why? Because is is
a static verb. Always think in straightforward active terms.
You might also notice I didn't
have a happy-sappy "Hollywood" ending. Those don't work in
literature. They work (I guess) in direct-to-video movies (and more than a few
that we see at the theater) and in supermarket novels, but not in quality
fiction, and that's what we're interested in here, I assume.
Doesn't look much like Missus
Grundy's Roman numeral outline, does it? But, if you read the story and then
compare it to the outline, you'll see it's all there. And it allows for you to
roam and be creative within the story. You just have to remain within the
strictures of the outline. But, there's a heck of a lot of freedom there!
Let’s look at just one of those
statements, the first one. Tommy cons
Pete into a kidnapping. In the short story, titled I Shoulda Seen a Credit Arranger, this action took about four
pages. Tommy comes into a bar where Pete’s hustling pool, draws him away from
the huckleberry he’s hustling to another bar, where he lays out the scam, to
kidnap the head of the Cajun Mafia and amputate his hand and hold that for
ransom. That was how I got to the outcome of the outlined point.
Then, in the novel, it took about
80 pages to get to the same point. I had more room with the novel. In the
novel, Pete still has the same problem—in heavy debt to the Mafia for
gambling—and Tommy cons him into the same kidnapping as before. But, this time,
to get to that place, there’s some other developments. First, Tommy talks Pete
into kidnapping a supermarket manager and holding his wife in their home with
Pete guarding her while Tommy and the manager go to his store and clean out his
safe. But, before that, the pair realize they don’t have suits and part of the
supermarket caper is that they have to go into their nice neighborhood and
without suits they’ll stick out. So, because they’re tapped out and neither
have a suit, they decide to pick up operating capital (to buy suits with) by
robbing a streetcar. Which goes horribly wrong. Now, because of a surveillance
camera on the streetcar, their pictures are everywhere on TV and the stakes are
really ratcheted up. Besides escaping the Mob, they now have to worry about the
law. Finally, they do kidnap the head of the Cajun Mafia and remove his hand.
See what I mean about the freedom this kind of outline allows? Enormous
freedom. They still get to the kidnapping, but this time, instead of driving straight
through, they go way down south to Arizona before they wend back up northwest
to L.A. Same outline, same outcome, different way to get there.
In the screenplay, they don’t get
to the kidnapping until about page 45. And, some other things happen there that
didn’t in the short story or novel. But…
they still end up in L.A. Can you see how this kind of outline gives you a
roadmap as well as complete freedom? It really, really does. It’s why when I
see as I did in the recent postings of another forum about people spouting off
about how they hate outlines, I know they’ve never been exposed to this kind.
They’re always thinking about 10-page (or longer!) monstrosities with all those
Roman numerals, describing the beginnings
and travel route to their scene or plot point goals. I agree. Those are
horrible, horrible, mind-numbing and creativity-stifling monsters. This isn’t
at all.
What this kind of outline does is
force you to think through the story before you write it. You spot problems
before you waste two hundred or two thousand (or more) words on them. Suddenly,
writing becomes a breeze. It really does.
In the story above, the
definition of a story is adhered to. A story consists of a character in trouble
- has a need, wants something, etc. A story always begins with the
inciting incident - whatever happens to drastically change the protagonist's
world and create a problem for him or her (it has to be the biggest problem in
his/her life at that point and one the reader will deem worthy enough to follow
him in solving it, reaching his/her goal). Pete's in trouble - he owes a lot of
money to a nasty bookie. He has to do something about it. He does get tricked
by Tommy into an ill-fated kidnapping, but once he's in it, he begins to take
his own action. You can have coincidence in a story, but it should never be a
coincidence that helps the main character. It can appear at first to do
so, but it never really can. It must always hinder the character. And
stories are drama, which means you must create scenes, not wander around inside
the head of the character, and scenes are by definition, action. There
must be dramatic action. Also, a protagonist may be reactive at first, but very
quickly he or she must become proactive, acting on his or her own behalf to
solve the problem, gain the goal, etc. Reactive characters (characters to whom
things "happen" in which they spend their time on stage reacting to
those things) are boring and don't belong in good fiction. And lastly, because
of an action the protagonist takes, there must come a reversal and a
change in the character. What Joyce called an "epiphany". Characters
in fiction, must, as a result of the actions of the story, become profoundly
changed from the person they were at the beginning of the story. Also, the character
can't just think through the problem, although obviously, that can be a part of
his epiphany, but it has to be occasioned by an action that he can then process
internally. The epiphany also cannot be attained through a conversation with
another character. There has to be an actual action which changes him and turns
the story. Once that happens, the story is over. Get out. Start a new story.
But first create an outline for it. You'll thank yourself.
A logical question is: What if I
see a “better” story or way for the character to get from Point A to Point B?
Maybe even an entirely different story? No problem. Just change your outline
and you still have a roadmap that’s easy to follow and one that give you
complete freedom.
The nice thing about this kind of
outline is that you save paper. You can write the whole thing on a napkin or
even a matchbook cover…
Once you've created an outline of
this sort, it's almost impossible to stray in the wrong direction. If you find
yourself doing that, just glance at the outline and get back on the right road.
Blue skies,
Les
And now--here's my new cover!
Ain't it cool?!
Monday, July 21, 2014
Just Add Champagne : BOOK REVIEW: The Bitch by Les Edgerton
Just Add Champagne : BOOK REVIEW: The Bitch by Les Edgerton: Ex-con Jake Bishop is several years past his second stint in prison and has completely reformed. He’s married, expecting a child, and pr...
Friday, July 11, 2014
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)







