Monday, March 17, 2014
New review of THE BITCH from across the pond...
Monday, 17 March 2014
Synopsis/blurb……
Ex-con Jake Bishop is several years past his second stint in prison and
has completely reformed. He’s married, expecting a child, and preparing to open
his own hair salon. But then an old cellmate re-enters his life begging for a
favour: to help him with a burglary. Forced by his code of ethics to perform
the crime, Jake’s once idyllic life quickly plunges into an abyss. Jake soon
realizes that there is only one way out of this purgatory . . . and it may
rupture his soul beyond repair.
Advance Praise
“The Bitch is the kind of raw crime fiction that’s right up
my alley, like sandpaper for the brain. Edgerton has got the chops. Mad chops.
Gonna make us all ashamed of our puny efforts one day.”
—Anthony Neil Smith, bestselling author of Choke on Your Lies,
Psychomatic, Hogdoggin’, Yellow Medicine, The Drummer, To the Devil, My
Regards, and others.
It might be a bit of an understatement but author Les
Edgerton has lived an interesting life. Born in Texas, his Wikipedia
entry states the following:
Later Edgerton
entered a period of his life he refers to as a years-long odyssey, during which
he:
· Sold and used drugs
· Worked for an escort
service for older, wealthy women in New Orleans
· Sold life insurance
· Worked as a headhunter
for a firm specializing in recruiting executives for businesses dealing with
electronic warfare
· Was a sports reporter
· Won 16 state
championships for hairstyling, a skill he learned in prison
· Co-hosted a
cable-television show about fashion in New Orleans
· Made a television
commercial
· Acted in a movie
· Was homeless and
eating out of a dumpster
· Went through several
marriages
· Attended A.A.
meetings
· Began writing seriously
Back to The Bitch then.
Not as bleak as many “noir” tagged novels I’ve read and
without spoiling anything for potential readers we don’t exit the book with
everyone living happily ever after. It is an interesting journey though in the
company of Jake Bishop, our main man – a rehabilitated ex-con. He’s happily
married, holding down a steady job and he’s got big career plans which will
provide for his future family. Life couldn’t be better.
Cue wheels falling off wagon, brown stuff hitting the fan etc
etc.
Bishop ill-advisedly takes a call from his old cell mate at
Pendleton. Despite his resolve to go straight and stay straight, Jake is then
sucked back into the criminal world and at risk of a life sentence back in
prison; a three-time felon or habitual offender - in con-speak “The
Bitch.”
Job, hair-dressing, wife, pregnancy, going straight,
business plans, brother, cops, burglary, blackmail, diamonds, friendship,
history, prison, alcoholism, recidivism, family, secrets, suspicion, snow,
murder, kidnap, shovels, bad luck, poor choices, more bad luck, more bad
decisions….ergo, death and everyone who survives initially lives unhappily ever
after, albeit with a much reduced life expectancy.
Edgerton gives us a likeable protagonist who through a combination
of ill-luck and poor decision-making gets locked in a downward spiral from
which there is no escape. Enjoyable and satisfying, with well-drawn characters,
a decent plot and great pace – overall an entertaining read. Even if at times I
was shouting……….NO!.....at Bishop’s fall!
This was my first taste of the author, but with a few other
books of his on the pile………The Death of Tarpons, Monday’s Meal, The Rapist,
Just Like That……….not my last.
I will count this as my Texas entry for my USA State Reading
Challenge. (4 down 47 to go!)
Accessed through the Net Galley website.
Review, news, and other potpourri...
Hi folks,
Got the following from the newsletter of my friend and
fellow writer, Mike Klaassen and thought I’d share with you. At the end, is
Mike’s contact info for his (free) newsletter which is always chockfull of good
writing advice, reviews, and tidbits. Tell him I sentcha!
Book Review
HOOKED: Write Fiction
That Grabs Readers at Page One and Never Lets Them Go
By Les Edgerton
Writer’s Digest Books, 2007
Hooked is the book about beginnings.
Books about fiction-writing tend to fall into one of three
categories:
- A-Z books, which address a wide spectrum of fiction-writing issues
- Quasi-biographical books, which are as much about the author as they are about writing
- Narrow-focus books, which take an in-depth look at a specific aspect of fiction-writing
Hooked, by Les
Edgerton, focuses on one aspect of fiction-writing: beginnings. In general, readers should expect a
narrow-focus book to:
- Adequately address its topic of focus, compiling and reorganizing the body of existing information
- Debunk misinformation and out-of-date practices about the topic
- Offer new ideas and insight about the topic
Les Edgerton has accomplished all of these in Hooked.
Why a whole book about beginnings? As explained by Edgerton, “The simple truth
is, if your beginning doesn’t do the job it needs to, the rest of the story
most likely won’t be read by the agent or editor or publisher you submit it
to.”
Edgerton addresses misinformation and out-of-date practices from
a historical perspective and as they relate to literary fiction. Whenever an author sheds new light on a
subject, there is a risk that someone will be offended: no exception here. Writers, of any genre, in the habit of
beginning stories with hefty servings of backstory or description get an
earful.
Those who believe that studying the classics is the key to
understanding fiction may be turned off by Edgerton’s take on beginnings: “. .
. many of the great books from the past aren’t practical structure models for
today’s market, particularly in the way some of those books begin.” And, “Beginnings have changed more than any
other part of story structure.”
Likewise, fans of literary fiction may take exception to
some of Edgerton’s observations. “Bookscan
has revealed the decline of what is usually referred to as literary
fiction. This category of fiction may be
dying because it has stuck with the story structure model of yesteryear much
more so than any other category.”
Hooked is organized
into eleven chapters:
- Story structure and scene
- Opening scenes
- Inciting incident, initial surface problem, story-worthy problem
- Setup and backstory
- Combining inciting incident, story-worthy problem, initial surface problem, setup, and backstory
- Introducing characters
- Foreshadowing, language, and setting
- Opening lines
- Red flags
- Opening scene length and transitions
- View from the agent’s and editor’s chair
The last chapter is structured as questions and answers from
agents and publishers. For example, from
agent Jodie Rhodes: “ . . . the more modest the writer, the better the
writing. That’s because good writers
know how much they still have to learn.”
Hooked is a must
for the bookshelf of serious students of fiction.
SUMMARIZATION: A fairly maligned
fiction-writing mode
By Mike Klaassen
Should you always "show"
rather than "tell?" Summarization
is the fiction-writing mode whereby story events are recapped. In summary mode
events are told rather than shown. Action mode shows an event in detail as it happens, summarization tells about it. The old writing axiom "Show.
Don't tell." implies that summarization is inferior writing, to be
discouraged. This is unfortunate because telling, in the form of summarization,
has a vital role.
Any event may be portrayed either in
the action mode or in summarization. Consider the following gunfight in action
mode:
As the sun reached its zenith, Cisco strode onto the dust-filled street
and faced Black Bart. Without warning, Bart reached for his pistol. Cisco dived
to the right as Bart fired. Cisco rolled in the dirt and drew his Peacemaker.
He fanned his hand across the Colt’s hammer in rapid succession, sending three
slugs into Bart’s chest.
The same event may be summarized as:
At noon, Cisco faced Black Bart and gunned him down in
the street.
Summary mode has many applications.
It may be used to: (1) report an event that doesn't warrant the detailed,
as-it-happens treatment of the action mode, (2) shift from one time or location
to another, (3) setup a writing passage by "catching up" the reader
on what has happened since the previous scene, sequel, chapter, or section or
(4) vary rhythm, pace, tone, or texture.[i]
REPORTING EVENTS
Summary mode is appropriate for
reporting events that don't warrant detailed, real-time presentation. As
fiction writers we make many decisions. We choose which events to report and
which to leave out. We choose which events to report in detail and which to
summarize. For example, depending upon the objectives of the author, the summary of the gunfight described above
may be appropriate. Readers may need to know that event occurred but don't need
to know the details. Telling lets the
reader speed past less important action. If fiction were a video player, action
would be accessed with the "Play" button, and summarization would be
the "Fast Forward" button, where events are skimmed over.
Summarization may be particularly
appropriate when there is repetition of events.[ii]
For example, if Black Bart was one of five gunfights Cisco had that day,
showing each of these events in action mode could become tedious for the
reader.
SHIFTING TIME OR LOCATION
Summarization provides an opportunity
to telescope time and shift locations. Rather than showing all the details in
an uninteresting journey, the writer might summarize it. For example:
Over the next three hours as the storm continued, they followed the
winding path around and over one dark hill after another.
Like a time machine fitted with a
global-positioning device, summarization can transport the character across
time and space.
SETTING UP A NEW PASSAGE OR VIEWPOINT CHARACTER
Summarization may be used to set up a
new scene, sequel, chapter, or section—even a change in a viewpoint character.
This may be accomplished at the beginning of the new passage simply by naming
the new viewpoint character and describing what he is doing, thinking, or
feeling. For example:
Fortney reached the top of the hill and stopped. Before him, as far as he
could see, stretched rolling, grass-covered hills.
VARYING RHYTHM, PACE, TONE, OR TEXTURE
Summarization and action, even when
used to describe the same event, have a different pace, rhythm, tone, and
texture (Just think of the gunfight described above). The decision to use one
versus the other becomes a tool for manipulating the story. For example,
imagine a medieval battle with knights engaged in a series of sword fights. The
writer might decide to describe the first fight in action mode, summarize the
next three (Over the next hour Arthur dispatched three more dark knights.), and
then show the climatic fight in gory detail.
As with each of the other ten
fiction-writing modes, summarization has both advantages and disadvantages.
Action involves the reader and is intimate and immediate, but too much action
can fatigue the reader. Summarization distances the reader and lacks immediacy.
Summarization offers one distinct advantage over the action mode, and that is
brevity.[iii]
Summarization deserves respect as a
fiction-writing mode. Without summarization, fiction could be tedious and
disjointed. For any particular passage of fiction, the challenge is to show
when appropriate and to tell when appropriate.
ABOUT MIKE
Mike Klaassen is the author of two young-adult novels: The
Brute and Cracks. He has also written numerous articles about the
craft of writing fiction. His current projects include a novel set during the
War of 1812 and a nonfiction book about the craft of writing fiction.
Mike and his wife, Carol, lived in the
Wichita, Kansas area while raising their two sons. After fighting cancer for
four years, Carol died in 2012.
Mike and Carol were good friends for twenty-five years with another couple, Michael and Gerri. Throughout those years Michael had multiple sclerosis, which became increasingly debilitating. Michael died one month before Carol. After each being married to a wonderful spouse for thirty-five years, Mike and Gerri are happily engaged.
Mike and Carol were good friends for twenty-five years with another couple, Michael and Gerri. Throughout those years Michael had multiple sclerosis, which became increasingly debilitating. Michael died one month before Carol. After each being married to a wonderful spouse for thirty-five years, Mike and Gerri are happily engaged.
You can learn more about Mike and his novels at www.mikeklaassen.com
Mike Klaassen
P.O.Box 4781
Wichita, KS 67204-0781
(316) 744-4325
SUBSCRIBE NOW
If you have enjoyed this newsletter and are not already receiving it automatically each month, you are welcome to a free subscription. Just click on the "Join Our Mailing List" button at the top of this page (also available at www.mikeklaassen.com). Or if you prefer, send an email to mike@klaassen.kscoxmail.com and ask to be added to Mike's ezine list.
If you have enjoyed this newsletter and are not already receiving it automatically each month, you are welcome to a free subscription. Just click on the "Join Our Mailing List" button at the top of this page (also available at www.mikeklaassen.com). Or if you prefer, send an email to mike@klaassen.kscoxmail.com and ask to be added to Mike's ezine list.
Thanks, Mike. Well, in a couple of days, my son Mike and I are jumping on a plane to go spend a week at my best friend Tom Rough's place in Cave Creek, AZ, and are going to see our beloved Giants WHIP UP on the Oakland A's in a spring training game in Scottsdale. Can't wait to be someplace where I'm not staring at six-foot-high snow drifts...
And, on a bit of a downer, The Rapist didn't win in the BigAl's recent contest. But, thank everybody for coming out and voting--I appreciate it! I'll try to do better next time...
Blue skies,
Les
Monday, March 10, 2014
AGENTS AND BRANDING... IN MERRIE OLDE ENGLAND...
Hi folks,
I don’t know if
you’ve seen this on the Intergnat, but historians recently unearthed a series
of letters between William Shakespeare and Leonard “Swifty” Cojone, a prominent
literary agent in Elizabethean times, which I thought you might find somewhat
interesting. Here they are, unexpurgated (which means I didn’t mess with ‘em).
Well, I didn’t personally purgate them, but the person who put them on the ‘Gnat
has taken the liberty of casting them in present-day English for easier
interpretation by today’s public school students.
Dear William
Shakespeare,
I was recently on
holiday, and happened to attend a performance of a play at the new theater over
at Stratford (the Globe, which has the best darn popcorn I think I’ve ever
tasted! The beer, however... skunky!). A play I understand you’d written, titled Richard
III. While I think you’ll agree that you’ll never be a Christopher Marlowe
or even a Thomas Nash, I have to confess that I was somewhat impressed by the
performance (enough that I could overlook the obvious historical fallacies to
which I ascribe the fault to lay at “artistic license.”). I think you have some
potential. I do feel it would benefit you to employ a better editor than the
one you currently use. For instance, that line, “Now is the winter of our
discontent,” is more than a bit ponderous and clumsy. I can doubtless help you
with those kinds of things among the other services I can provide.
If you’re not yet
aware of whom I am (please indulge me a polite laugh as I’m sure you do unless you’ve
been living in Manchester or Newcastle!), I am Leonard Cojone, literary agent extraordinaire.
And, it is in this role that I am contacting you, sir. I should like to talk to
you about possible representation of your work. I assume you plan to write
additional plays?
I take but a
paltry ten percent of receipts for my considerable influence in both publishing
your work and gaining entree into Europe’s finest theaters.
If you are
interested, please reply as soon as possible. I’m not sure how long I might
retain interest as there are other playwrights I’m also interested in.
Sincerely,
Leonard “Swifty”
Cojones, Esq.
P.S. That aforementioned
line:” Now is the winter of our discontent” could benefit by being changed to
something more accessible to today’s playgoer to something like: “It was a dark
and stormy night.” This is the kind of assistance I am able and more than
willing to offer should we effect a partnership.
Dear Squire
Cojones,
I am so pleased
that a gentleman of your considerable influence would see fit to see value in
my humble scribbling. I would be delighted to speak with you about possible
representation. I am presently penning a new play, a comedy. May I send you a
copy for your consideration?
Your Humble Svt,
Wm. Shakespeare
Dear William,
Well! This poses
a problem for me! You say you’re writing a comedy? But, the other plays I’ve
seen or am aware of from you have all been dramas. Why would you do this to
yourself? To your career? Are you not aware of the value of building a brand?
You seen to have secured a bit of a foothold with your dramas (even with the
historical errors, not to mention some elements that I would have changed,
i.e., the situation where there is far too little violence—only Richard himself
dies on stage and I think you know as well as I that our gentle English folks
much enjoy far more bloodshed upon the boards than you’ve allowed), and as one who
has his finger on the pulse of the public, to venture into another form seems
to me to court professional suicide.
Besides, when one
says he writes “comedy,” I confess I have to take that with the proverbial
grain of salt, sir. It is one thing to claim to have a humorous bent of mind,
but my experience has been that those who claim that particular skill, almost
always are just not funny, except to relatives and other prejudiced parties.
This presents
somewhat of an obstacle for me. I think you may have somewhat of a future in
drama and tragedies; I am not so sure that switching to comedies wouldn’t be
the kiss of death for your career. I should like to dissuade you from putting
pen to humor, sir. If not, perhaps I am not the agent for your future success.
Please advise.
Sincerely,
L. Cojones, Esq.
Dear Mr.
Cojones,
Please don’t
misunderstand. I plan not to abandon dramatic works nor tragedies; I simply
possess a wider range of interests and although it is possible I cannot write
humor—I do have valued friends who have convinced me that I can. My friend,
Francis Bacon, has told me more than once when we are in our cups down at
the tavern, that he has often “spurted ale through his nose” at some of the
witticisms I uttered. Many times, he has smiled and told me he was going to “steal that
line” at some pithy saying I threw out. Might I not send you a copy of the play
I am currently putting to parchment, with the working title, “A Midsummer Night’s
Dream?”
Yr Humble Svt,
Wm. Shakespeare
Dear William,
May I call you
Bill? Bill, I believe you are making a tragic turn in your career. Not only are
comedies not selling well these days, this appears from the title to have supernatural
elements. Well, sir—I am here to report that supernatural plays are over. OVER!
Their day has long passed. No theater in England will present a play with
supernatural bits to it. Are you mad, Bill? Are you taking meals at the hatters and perhaps accidentally ingested some mercury in your bitters?
Oh, Bill, I wish
I could make you fully aware of the professional suicide I see you are making
with these foolish notions of writing comedy! You seem to have a bit of a knack
at creating drama, but I see nothing but disaster and a sad ending for you
should you pursue this folly of mounting a comedic play! The thing is, Billy,
through much scientific research and polling, we have determined the only way
to create and sustain a profitable career in the theater is by creating a brand
for the author. A brand, Bill! That means your name becomes synonymous with a
single element. In your case, that brand is tragedy.
If you cannot see
the wisdom of this advice and persist in following your foolish and ill-advised
tack of persisting with this comedy idiocy, then I have no recourse but to end
our communication and withdraw my offer of representation to you. I see no profit in continuing our discussion.
This is a sad day
for me, sir. I honestly thought I saw a bit of talent in you. Alas, I was wrong
it seems.
Regards,
Leonard
Dear Lenny,
Go fucketh thyself. With all possible sooth and dispatch.
Bill
So we see, boys
and girls, the more things change the more they stay the same…
Blue skies,
Les
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)