Monday, March 10, 2014
AGENTS AND BRANDING... IN MERRIE OLDE ENGLAND...
Hi folks,
I don’t know if
you’ve seen this on the Intergnat, but historians recently unearthed a series
of letters between William Shakespeare and Leonard “Swifty” Cojone, a prominent
literary agent in Elizabethean times, which I thought you might find somewhat
interesting. Here they are, unexpurgated (which means I didn’t mess with ‘em).
Well, I didn’t personally purgate them, but the person who put them on the ‘Gnat
has taken the liberty of casting them in present-day English for easier
interpretation by today’s public school students.
Dear William
Shakespeare,
I was recently on
holiday, and happened to attend a performance of a play at the new theater over
at Stratford (the Globe, which has the best darn popcorn I think I’ve ever
tasted! The beer, however... skunky!). A play I understand you’d written, titled Richard
III. While I think you’ll agree that you’ll never be a Christopher Marlowe
or even a Thomas Nash, I have to confess that I was somewhat impressed by the
performance (enough that I could overlook the obvious historical fallacies to
which I ascribe the fault to lay at “artistic license.”). I think you have some
potential. I do feel it would benefit you to employ a better editor than the
one you currently use. For instance, that line, “Now is the winter of our
discontent,” is more than a bit ponderous and clumsy. I can doubtless help you
with those kinds of things among the other services I can provide.
If you’re not yet
aware of whom I am (please indulge me a polite laugh as I’m sure you do unless you’ve
been living in Manchester or Newcastle!), I am Leonard Cojone, literary agent extraordinaire.
And, it is in this role that I am contacting you, sir. I should like to talk to
you about possible representation of your work. I assume you plan to write
additional plays?
I take but a
paltry ten percent of receipts for my considerable influence in both publishing
your work and gaining entree into Europe’s finest theaters.
If you are
interested, please reply as soon as possible. I’m not sure how long I might
retain interest as there are other playwrights I’m also interested in.
Sincerely,
Leonard “Swifty”
Cojones, Esq.
P.S. That aforementioned
line:” Now is the winter of our discontent” could benefit by being changed to
something more accessible to today’s playgoer to something like: “It was a dark
and stormy night.” This is the kind of assistance I am able and more than
willing to offer should we effect a partnership.
Dear Squire
Cojones,
I am so pleased
that a gentleman of your considerable influence would see fit to see value in
my humble scribbling. I would be delighted to speak with you about possible
representation. I am presently penning a new play, a comedy. May I send you a
copy for your consideration?
Your Humble Svt,
Wm. Shakespeare
Dear William,
Well! This poses
a problem for me! You say you’re writing a comedy? But, the other plays I’ve
seen or am aware of from you have all been dramas. Why would you do this to
yourself? To your career? Are you not aware of the value of building a brand?
You seen to have secured a bit of a foothold with your dramas (even with the
historical errors, not to mention some elements that I would have changed,
i.e., the situation where there is far too little violence—only Richard himself
dies on stage and I think you know as well as I that our gentle English folks
much enjoy far more bloodshed upon the boards than you’ve allowed), and as one who
has his finger on the pulse of the public, to venture into another form seems
to me to court professional suicide.
Besides, when one
says he writes “comedy,” I confess I have to take that with the proverbial
grain of salt, sir. It is one thing to claim to have a humorous bent of mind,
but my experience has been that those who claim that particular skill, almost
always are just not funny, except to relatives and other prejudiced parties.
This presents
somewhat of an obstacle for me. I think you may have somewhat of a future in
drama and tragedies; I am not so sure that switching to comedies wouldn’t be
the kiss of death for your career. I should like to dissuade you from putting
pen to humor, sir. If not, perhaps I am not the agent for your future success.
Please advise.
Sincerely,
L. Cojones, Esq.
Dear Mr.
Cojones,
Please don’t
misunderstand. I plan not to abandon dramatic works nor tragedies; I simply
possess a wider range of interests and although it is possible I cannot write
humor—I do have valued friends who have convinced me that I can. My friend,
Francis Bacon, has told me more than once when we are in our cups down at
the tavern, that he has often “spurted ale through his nose” at some of the
witticisms I uttered. Many times, he has smiled and told me he was going to “steal that
line” at some pithy saying I threw out. Might I not send you a copy of the play
I am currently putting to parchment, with the working title, “A Midsummer Night’s
Dream?”
Yr Humble Svt,
Wm. Shakespeare
Dear William,
May I call you
Bill? Bill, I believe you are making a tragic turn in your career. Not only are
comedies not selling well these days, this appears from the title to have supernatural
elements. Well, sir—I am here to report that supernatural plays are over. OVER!
Their day has long passed. No theater in England will present a play with
supernatural bits to it. Are you mad, Bill? Are you taking meals at the hatters and perhaps accidentally ingested some mercury in your bitters?
Oh, Bill, I wish
I could make you fully aware of the professional suicide I see you are making
with these foolish notions of writing comedy! You seem to have a bit of a knack
at creating drama, but I see nothing but disaster and a sad ending for you
should you pursue this folly of mounting a comedic play! The thing is, Billy,
through much scientific research and polling, we have determined the only way
to create and sustain a profitable career in the theater is by creating a brand
for the author. A brand, Bill! That means your name becomes synonymous with a
single element. In your case, that brand is tragedy.
If you cannot see
the wisdom of this advice and persist in following your foolish and ill-advised
tack of persisting with this comedy idiocy, then I have no recourse but to end
our communication and withdraw my offer of representation to you. I see no profit in continuing our discussion.
This is a sad day
for me, sir. I honestly thought I saw a bit of talent in you. Alas, I was wrong
it seems.
Regards,
Leonard
Dear Lenny,
Go fucketh thyself. With all possible sooth and dispatch.
Bill
So we see, boys
and girls, the more things change the more they stay the same…
Blue skies,
Les
Labels:
branding,
Shakespeare
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
9 comments:
Love this!
Fab! Good to know that even the bard had the same problems as we mere mortals...
Thanks, ladies! You'll be happy to learn that Mr. Shakespeare did okay even though he defied the current "wisdom" of Swifty... Turns out, he was a bit funny...
Ha!
Good news for me. I'm a bit funny too. Of course, that has nothing to do with my writing, but still...
Historical accuracy fine, geographical-somewhat iffy.
The Stratford of which you speak was on ye olde river of Avon, some 100 miles north of the Globe theatre which stands restored and rebuilt (thanks in part to the efforts of your countryman Sam Wanamaker) at Bankside on the river Thames. Otherwise, very funny and wise.
Thanks, Shaun and Lesley. Lesley, I was fairly certain it wasn't accurate and was never intended to be--didn't plan on doing research for something I whipped up in ten minutes! Besides, the agent was drunk and got mixed up on his places... As I do... often... :)
Sorry, Les. Forgot to put in the :)
Sorry, Les. Forgot to put in the :)
Lesley, since it's now there twice - the :) - does that qualify as a double entendre?
Hey, congrats on your good news!
Post a Comment